Each week, new filings are made in ongoing and new proceedings that affect utility services, communities, and consumers in California. These filings include Proposed Decisions open for public comment, as well as new complaints and applications that may influence future policy and regulatory actions.
For those interested in participating, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) allows the public to submit written comments on Proposed Decisions through the proceeding’s Docket Card. Individuals can also subscribe to CPUC’s Subscription Service using a proceeding number to receive updates and notices.
During the week of September 29 to October 3, 2025, several notable filings were recorded:
A Proposed Decision was issued dismissing Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s application for approval of a Zonal Electrification Pilot Project at California State University Monterey Bay.
New applications include one from Southern California Gas Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company seeking authority to revise natural gas rates and implement storage proposals effective January 1, 2027. Another application was filed by PacifiCorp requesting continuation of its energy efficiency programs along with related funding measures for program year 2027.
Several complaints were also submitted during this period. The California Solar & Storage Association filed a complaint against Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company alleging violations of Rule 21. Another complaint involves National Community Renaissance against Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company over alleged violations of Rule 21.
Additional cases involve billing errors or service issues raised by individual complainants against various utilities including Wave Energy LLC, Southern California Gas Company, Pacific Bell d/b/a AT&T California, Frontier Communications entities, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company regarding different aspects such as failure to provide service or reliable service, overbilling, or violation of safety regulations.
An appeal was also filed by Carey Limousine S.F. Inc., contesting a $20,000 penalty issued by the CPUC’s Consumer Protection and Enforcement Division.
“Stay Informed and Make Your Voice Heard!” encourages members of the public who wish to participate in these proceedings or keep updated on their developments.
